barcode_doesn_t_match_human_readable_text
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
barcode_doesn_t_match_human_readable_text [2020/05/06 14:34 (4 years ago)] – created swind | barcode_doesn_t_match_human_readable_text [2021/05/27 14:07 (3 years ago)] (current) – swind | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Scanned Barcode Doesn' | ====== Scanned Barcode Doesn' | ||
- | [[http:// | + | <note important> |
+ | </note> | ||
====== Overview ====== | ====== Overview ====== | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
Barcode should have been 73667600306 and this is what the human readable text also displays. | Barcode should have been 73667600306 and this is what the human readable text also displays. | ||
+ | {{: | ||
When we scan the barcode it scans as 073667600302. | When we scan the barcode it scans as 073667600302. | ||
Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
You must instead use either 3of9 or Code128. Both of these simply translate the value that they are given into a barcode, regardless of the length. Code128 and 3of9 also have the added advantage of being able to use alphabetic and numeric characters which is why they are used for serial number barcodes. | You must instead use either 3of9 or Code128. Both of these simply translate the value that they are given into a barcode, regardless of the length. Code128 and 3of9 also have the added advantage of being able to use alphabetic and numeric characters which is why they are used for serial number barcodes. | ||
- | UPC’s are specifically formatted to meet the U.P.C rules. | + | UPC’s are specifically formatted to meet the U.P.C rules. |
== Steve Wind - May 6, 2020 == | == Steve Wind - May 6, 2020 == |
barcode_doesn_t_match_human_readable_text.1588800883.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/05/06 14:34 (4 years ago) by swind